Not keen on this, the portfolio/recent work section doesn't allow you to select a project and you have to plod through from one to the other. And I still can't say the name.

Neil, emphasis is on "e".

Nice colours, but I don't like the way the elements are (not) horizontally aligned. They could do with considering a grid structure. Perhaps they were trying to centre everything.

I was a bit taken back by their stance on selecting client's: http://logistetica.com/about/

Although many of us have thoughts similar to this, documenting them so bluntly on your website may deter potential clients who may fall under the 'Parking' category.

Underlined links just for the sake of being underlined?

Not that I'm saying it’s not attractive, however, seems like they're doing it just to show that they’re following the web standards. Understandable, but still, it is confusing on their http://logistetica.com/services page when you mouse over their services and they give feedback but not click-able. What’s the point then?

Hey everyone, thanks for comments. It's Alexander with Logistetica (correct, emphasis on "e" %). Just couple comments: 1) we don't underline links for the sake of standards. In fact we don't give a damn about standards. And 2) Yes we're quite blatant (I know some are turned away by that) by our criteria for clients. In fact most of the ones who fall under it won't be our clients anyway, eventually, so it doesn't matter at what point they realize that.